🔗 Share this article

Former President Donald Trump has consistently shown his desire to see critics investigated, exerting pressure on the DOJ to charge former FBI Director James Comey and New York Attorney General Letitia James.

"We can't delay any longer, it's killing our reputation and trustworthiness," the president stated recently in a Truth Social message.

"They impeached me, and indicted me (5 times!)" he declared, referencing the four criminal cases he faced after leaving the White House in 2021 and James's lawsuit.

Each have since been charged, in cases that many specialists have stated seem to be driven by politics and difficult to win in legal proceedings.

But the latest charges against a presidential opponent, ex security advisor John Bolton, stand apart, legal specialists and former prosecutors say.

"In my opinion, contrasting Bolton's case to James' is like comparing apples to oranges," stated Mark Lesko, a former acting US attorney for the Eastern District of New York.

The Specifics of Bolton's Legal Situation

Bolton has been formally charged on national allegations pertaining to the alleged mishandling of classified information. After departing the White House in 2019, he has become a outspoken presidential opponent, even to describe him "stunningly uninformed" and unsuitable for office in his memoir.

Specialists say that while there may be political reasons to target Bolton, the procedures used to secure an charge and the evidence compiled against him suggest a possibly stronger case than the DOJ brought against Comey.

"These actions that's being claimed is both more severe and seems to have occurred over a significant duration," commented Carissa Byrne Hessick, a academic at the University of North Carolina School of Law.

Throughout his time as Trump's national security adviser, and after his 2019 White House departure, authorities alleged that Bolton placed the country at risk by wrongfully retaining and transmitting sensitive documents to family members using insecure means, including AOL. Several of the documents were labeled highly classified.

The indictment alleges that at a certain time a unauthorized user accessed to Bolton's account where documents were kept and transmitted an seeming warning to cause "the largest controversy since Hillary [Clinton]'s emails were leaked".

Bolton entered a not guilty plea during a court appearance on Friday to 18 distinct counts of improperly handling classified information.

Retribution or a Strong Case?

The schedule of his indictment - coming on the heels of charges against Comey - has renewed questions about political pressure on the legal system.

Trump once implied Bolton belonged in prison, and described him a "sleazebag". Bolton, for his role, authored a book about his experience in the Trump government that was highly critical of the president.

"There's no question that the timing of this charge, when combined with additional cases, has prompted questions about the strength of these charges, and why these counts are being brought now," said Jamil Jaffer, founder and executive director of the National Security Institute.

Nevertheless, he continued, "should the DOJ is capable to prove the allegations stated and demonstrate the information is properly classified, his conduct may very well have broken the statute".

Prosecuting such a high-ranking official for mishandling classified documents is "uncommon" but not without precedent, said Carrie Cordero, a senior fellow at the Center for a New American Security.

"Cases that involve classified information present challenges to prosecute, but they may and are brought against equally low-level and high-level officials, from time to time," she said.

Similarities to Examinations into Former President and President

Trump likewise encountered allegations of improperly keeping classified documents at his Mar-a-Lago resort in Florida and obstructing their recovery, but that matter was eventually dismissed by a federal judge and voided by his re-election as president.

A independent investigator additionally determined that former President Joe Biden improperly maintained classified documents from his time as second-in-command, but failed to prosecute him.

Bolton's case shares characteristics to Biden's classified documents matters, noted Mr Lesko, who previously held a top security position at the DOJ.

Strict protocols govern the handling of sensitive materials. To win a guilty verdict, the government must prove that Bolton knew the information he was sending was classified, and he had to intentionally transfer it to someone without authorization to receive it.

"Due to the sensitive character of the material at question in this case, we lack a lot of particulars about why the government believes elements like the personal notes and the other information he shared by electronic message, and why there were restricted," explained Mr Jaffer.

A Increasingly Conventional Prosecution

The process by which the Justice Department initiated this legal action will be closely examined, after Trump publicly posted his desire to see his political opponents charged and some of those charges came to fruition.

But Mr Lesko indicated in Bolton's situation, authorities appear to have adhered to standard procedure.

"The Bolton case and eventually the indictment seemed to have followed the standard process including the regulations and norms within the DOJ," he said.

In contrast to Comey's short, two-page charge, Bolton's was a increasingly "conventional" document that "explicitly outlines the details concerning the circumstances and situation in this instance," Mr Lesko said.

"It seems fairly consistent with a series of precedents... where government officials improperly handled and shared sensitive information."